pharmadog
News
when
  • Latest
  • Archive
by source
  • All Sources
  • Sources Page
Jobs
department
  • Clinical
  • Regulatory
  • Medical Affairs
  • Commercial
  • R&D / Discovery
  • Biostatistics / Data
  • Manufacturing / CMC
  • Market Access
therapeutic area
  • Oncology
  • Immunology
  • Neuroscience
  • Cardiovascular
  • Metabolic
  • Rare Disease
  • Infectious Disease
location & type
  • Remote Only
  • US Only
  • California
  • Massachusetts
  • Internships
  • Phase 3 Roles
  • All Jobs →
Drugs
by stage
  • Marketed
  • Phase 3
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1
  • Preclinical
browse
  • Most catalysts
  • Recently active
  • All drugs →
  • Companies
  • Patent cliff
Calendar
what
  • Trial readouts
  • PDUFA dates
  • Approvals
  • Earnings
when
  • Upcoming
  • Month grid
  • Recently passed
Sign InSubscribe
pharmadog

fetch the data · sniff the signal

Discover
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Drugs
  • Calendar
  • Companies
Hubs
  • Topics
  • Patent cliff
  • Publications
  • Readouts
Tools
  • Compare
  • Search
  • Bookmarks
Trust
  • About
  • Sources
  • Contact
Legal
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Pricing

© 2026 pharmadog.xyz

made by humans and a good dog

  • home
  • jobs
  • news
  • search
STAT·2h ago·1 min read
save

CMS proposes changes to curb 340B drug discount program’s costly subsidies to safety-net hospitals

Oct 8, 2026·read at STAT ↗RegulatoryNegative

Casey B. Mulligan, chief economist and chief regulatory officer at HHS, wrote an opinion piece outlining a major flaw in the 340B drug discount program. The program, created in 1992, gives steep discounts to safety‑net hospitals but Medicare and other insurers often reimburse at full price, allowing hospitals to keep the difference.

The difference, or spread, increases as drug prices rise, effectively rewarding hospitals for using higher‑cost drugs and for acquiring physician practices and infusion clinics. Patients’ treatment needs may stay the same, yet their out‑of‑pocket coinsurance can exceed what the hospital paid for the drug.

A new HHS report highlights these unintended consequences and proposes to narrow the gap between discounted purchase costs and reimbursement. The goal is to reduce the subsidy that inflates Medicare patients’ coinsurance and to align incentives more closely with patient care.

The proposed regulatory changes aim to rein in the program’s growth and protect both patients and payers from excessive costs.

source

This writeup was produced by pharmadog from original reporting by STAT.

Original headline: “Opinion: How CMS plans to fix a major flaw in the 340B drug discount program”

read at STAT ↗
1,076 words · retrieved 1h ago
sharex / twitterlinkedin

comments(0)

5-min edit window · permanent after that
sign in to leave a comment · permanent archive after 5 minutes
no comments yet — first sniff?

companies & drugs in this story

companies
PATH
topics
Oncology2Infectious DiseaseProstate Cancer

related stories

  • 2h agoOpinion: England and other nations are on the path toward eliminating hepatitis C. Why not the U.S.?STAT
  • Dec 22Fierce Biotech Fundraising Tracker '26: KymaThera corrals $80M; RougeTx lifts off with $58MFierce Biotech
  • 1d agoAdecto, Aviceda shut downBioSpace
  • Aug 21Scientists deploy Merck’s Ebola vaccine in DRCSTAT
  • Aug 13PDS halts work on phase 3 cancer therapy to focus on colorectal contenderFierce Biotech