pharmadog
News
when
  • Latest
  • Archive
by source
  • All Sources
  • Sources Page
Jobs
department
  • Clinical
  • Regulatory
  • Medical Affairs
  • Commercial
  • R&D / Discovery
  • Biostatistics / Data
  • Manufacturing / CMC
  • Market Access
therapeutic area
  • Oncology
  • Immunology
  • Neuroscience
  • Cardiovascular
  • Metabolic
  • Rare Disease
  • Infectious Disease
location & type
  • Remote Only
  • US Only
  • California
  • Massachusetts
  • Internships
  • Phase 3 Roles
  • All Jobs →
Drugs
by stage
  • Marketed
  • Phase 3
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1
  • Preclinical
browse
  • Most catalysts
  • Recently active
  • All drugs →
  • Companies
  • Patent cliff
Calendar
what
  • Trial readouts
  • PDUFA dates
  • Approvals
  • Earnings
when
  • Upcoming
  • Month grid
  • Recently passed
Sign InSubscribe
pharmadog

fetch the data · sniff the signal

Discover
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Drugs
  • Calendar
  • Companies
Hubs
  • Topics
  • Patent cliff
  • Publications
  • Readouts
Tools
  • Compare
  • Search
  • Bookmarks
Trust
  • About
  • Sources
  • Contact
Legal
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Pricing

© 2026 pharmadog.xyz

made by humans and a good dog

  • home
  • jobs
  • news
  • search
STAT·2h ago·1 min read
save

Experts warn FDA against approving Grail’s ineffective multicancer blood test

Oct 6, 2026·read at STAT ↗RegulatoryNegative

Physician and cancer‑screening researcher H. Gilbert Welch argues that the FDA should not greenlight Grail’s multicancer blood test, noting the company’s trial of 140,000 participants used a weak surrogate endpoint and failed to meet it.

Despite the trial’s shortcomings, an FDA advisory panel has recommended approval, and new legislation would allow Medicare to cover the test, potentially shifting costs to taxpayers.

Welch points out that Grail has made bold claims about saving tens of thousands of lives, yet the company has faced lawsuits from its own investors in 2024 and 2026, raising doubts about its credibility.

He also highlights concerns about Grail’s ties to the UK’s NHS and former Prime Minister David Cameron, suggesting the test’s promotion may be driven more by political and financial interests than solid scientific evidence.

source

This writeup was produced by pharmadog from original reporting by STAT.

Original headline: “Opinion: Why the FDA should not approve an ineffective multicancer screening test”

read at STAT ↗
1,314 words · retrieved 1h ago
sharex / twitterlinkedin

comments(0)

5-min edit window · permanent after that
sign in to leave a comment · permanent archive after 5 minutes
no comments yet — first sniff?

companies & drugs in this story

companies
LILLY2Boundless Bio, Inc.PFIZER
drugs
pirtobrutinib
topics
Oncology38Approval7Hematology5CLLProstate CancerPulmonologyVaccineVaccines

related stories

  • 21h agoSTAT+: Lilly’s Jaypirca approved as first-line CLL therapySTAT
  • 3d agoFoghorn cuts 40% of workforceBioSpace
  • Jun 2910 clinical trials to watch in the second half of 2026BioPharma Dive
  • Dec 22Fierce Biotech Fundraising Tracker '26: TriGemX tacks on $94M; AnaCardio adds $71MFierce Biotech
  • Sep 286 immunology targets to sustain a mammoth I&I marketBioSpace