TAVR vs. SAVR Study of VitaFlow Liberty® for Severe BAV Stenosis

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as the first-line treatment for symptomatic severe AS currently, while TAVR for bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis has not been well demonstrated in randomized controlled trials, thus more randomized controlled studies of TAVR vs. SAVR are still needed to provide strong evidence that TAVR treatment for patients with BAV stenosis has good safety and effectiveness.

This study is a prospective, international multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferiority clinical study, in which the study device (VitaFlow Liberty®) for TAVR is to be demonstrated as non-inferior to the control device (a commercially available surgical bioprosthetic valve) for SAVR in terms of the incidence of composite endpoint events (all-cause mortality, all strokes and re-hospitalizations) at 12 months postoperatively.

In this study, 452 eligible subjects will be randomly assigned to the study group (n=226) or the control group (n=226) in a 1:1 ratio. The subjects in study group will be treated with the TAVR surgery using the study device (VitaFlow Liberty®) , while the subjects in control group will be treated with the SAVR surgery using the control device (a commercially available surgical bioprosthetic valve), and clinical follow-ups will be performed at discharge (or 7 days after surgery), 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and 2, 3, 4, 5 years after surgery, respectively.