clinical trial · NCT05615259
Comparison Between Exactech Guided Personalized Surgery (GPS) and Conventional Instrumentation of Shoulder Arthroplasty
Exactech·—·recruiting·n = 260
TechnologyComparison
brief summary
The primary objective of this study is to examine the optimization of Reverse Shouder Arthroplasty implant position between GPS and conventional techniques. The secondary objective is to assess the effect of implant position using GPS vs. conventional techniques on ROM and patient reported outcomes. Long-term follow-up to 10 years with minimum 2 year follow-up for patients.
started
Sep 23, 2020
primary completion
Dec 31, 2030
completion
Sep 30, 2031
last updated
Feb 28, 2025
official title
A Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized Clinical Study of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Comparing Exactech Guided Personalized Surgery (GPS) vs. Conventional Instrumentation
sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov · pharmadog mirrors structured fields, not the full protocol