pharmadog
News
when
  • Latest
  • Archive
by source
  • All Sources
  • Sources Page
Jobs
department
  • Clinical
  • Regulatory
  • Medical Affairs
  • Commercial
  • R&D / Discovery
  • Biostatistics / Data
  • Manufacturing / CMC
  • Market Access
therapeutic area
  • Oncology
  • Immunology
  • Neuroscience
  • Cardiovascular
  • Metabolic
  • Rare Disease
  • Infectious Disease
location & type
  • Remote Only
  • US Only
  • California
  • Massachusetts
  • Internships
  • Phase 3 Roles
  • All Jobs →
Drugs
by stage
  • Marketed
  • Phase 3
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1
  • Preclinical
browse
  • Most catalysts
  • Recently active
  • All drugs →
  • Companies
  • Patent cliff
Calendar
what
  • Trial readouts
  • PDUFA dates
  • Approvals
  • Earnings
when
  • Upcoming
  • Month grid
  • Recently passed
Sign InSubscribe
pharmadog

fetch the data · sniff the signal

Discover
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Drugs
  • Calendar
  • Companies
Hubs
  • Topics
  • Patent cliff
  • Publications
  • Readouts
Tools
  • Compare
  • Search
  • Bookmarks
Trust
  • About
  • Sources
  • Contact
Legal
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Pricing

© 2026 pharmadog.xyz

made by humans and a good dog

  • home
  • jobs
  • news
  • search
Fierce Biotech·3d ago·1 min read
save

Novartis Lp(a) drug pelacarsen shows no cardiovascular benefit, raising doubts on Amgen and Lilly programs

Nov 5, 2026·read at Fierce Biotech ↗Negative readoutNegative

Novartis disclosed that its phase 3 Lp(a)Horizon trial of pelacarsen, an antisense oligonucleotide partnered with Ionis, failed to demonstrate any reduction in major cardiovascular events. The drug lowered Lp(a) levels as expected but did not improve outcomes compared with placebo.

At a median follow‑up of 4.7 years, 12.3% of patients receiving pelacarsen experienced a major adverse cardiovascular event versus 12.1% on placebo. Even among participants with baseline Lp(a) of at least 90 mg/dL, the event rates were identical at 12.3% for both arms.

The negative result dampens optimism for similar programs from Amgen and Eli Lilly, whose own Lp(a)‑targeting candidates are awaiting readouts. Analysts now question whether lowering Lp(a) alone can translate into clinical benefit.

source

This writeup was produced by pharmadog from original reporting by Fierce Biotech.

Original headline: “Novartis’ Lp(a) drug shows zero benefit, casting shadow over Amgen and Lilly programs”

read at Fierce Biotech ↗
495 words · retrieved 1d ago
sharex / twitterlinkedin

comments(0)

5-min edit window · permanent after that
sign in to leave a comment · permanent archive after 5 minutes
no comments yet — first sniff?

companies & drugs in this story

companies
AMGEN10LILLY9NOVARTIS9ELI LILLY CO4HORIZON2
drugs
olpasiran3
topics
Cardiology9Antisense Oligonucleotide (ASO)2Big PharmasiRNA

related stories

  • Sep 8Novartis’ cholesterol-lowering medicine fails Phase 3, clouding Lp(a) horizonsBioSpace
  • Sep 11Novartis drags peers down with triple asset stumbleBioSpace
  • Sep 11Novartis drags peers down with triple asset failureBioSpace
  • Sep 8Novartis’ $12B Avidity acquisition hits Phase 3 speedbump as dystrophy drug disappointsBioSpace
  • Sep 4Novartis Lp(a) drug fails to lower cardiovascular risk in closely watched ph. 3 trialFierce Biotech