pharmadog
News
when
  • Latest
  • Archive
by source
  • All Sources
  • Sources Page
Jobs
department
  • Clinical
  • Regulatory
  • Medical Affairs
  • Commercial
  • R&D / Discovery
  • Biostatistics / Data
  • Manufacturing / CMC
  • Market Access
therapeutic area
  • Oncology
  • Immunology
  • Neuroscience
  • Cardiovascular
  • Metabolic
  • Rare Disease
  • Infectious Disease
location & type
  • Remote Only
  • US Only
  • California
  • Massachusetts
  • Internships
  • Phase 3 Roles
  • All Jobs →
Drugs
by stage
  • Marketed
  • Phase 3
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1
  • Preclinical
browse
  • Most catalysts
  • Recently active
  • All drugs →
  • Companies
  • Patent cliff
Calendar
what
  • Trial readouts
  • PDUFA dates
  • Approvals
  • Earnings
when
  • Upcoming
  • Month grid
  • Recently passed
Sign InSubscribe
pharmadog

fetch the data · sniff the signal

Discover
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Drugs
  • Calendar
  • Companies
Hubs
  • Topics
  • Patent cliff
  • Publications
  • Readouts
Tools
  • Compare
  • Search
  • Bookmarks
Trust
  • About
  • Sources
  • Contact
Legal
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Pricing

© 2026 pharmadog.xyz

made by humans and a good dog

  • home
  • jobs
  • news
  • search
STAT·1h ago·1 min read
save

Medical records often miss women's health experiences, limiting AI's potential

Nov 6, 2026·read at STAT ↗Negative

Ann Hirsch and Jennifer Silva argue that artificial intelligence cannot reach its full promise in women's health until medical records capture the complete picture of patients' lives. They cite a recent Gallup-Pivotal Women’s Health Survey showing that over a third of U.S. women feel their symptoms have been minimized or dismissed by providers, and many report misdiagnoses.

The authors conducted a study of 87 women, pairing electronic medical records with in‑depth interviews about pain, illness, work, family, poverty, violence, and health‑care interactions. While 53 participants described a trust‑breaking encounter, only seven had any documentation of mistrust in their records. Similarly, 32 reported misdiagnoses but only eight were recorded, and 30 felt disrespected by clinicians yet none of those experiences appeared in the charts.

These gaps suggest that current clinical data omit critical information about women's health experiences, limiting the ability of AI models to learn from real‑world outcomes. Hirsch and Silva call for more comprehensive documentation to ensure AI tools can improve diagnosis and treatment for women.

source

This writeup was produced by pharmadog from original reporting by STAT.

Original headline: “Opinion: AI depends on medical records that don’t always tell the full truth about women”

read at STAT ↗
1,003 words · retrieved 14m ago
sharex / twitterlinkedin

comments(0)

5-min edit window · permanent after that
sign in to leave a comment · permanent archive after 5 minutes
no comments yet — first sniff?

companies & drugs in this story

no entities indexed yet

related stories

  • 1h agoOpinion: What it’s like to live with cognitively unimpaired Alzheimer’s diseaseSTAT
  • 1h agoMost people haven’t heard of kratom. What is it, and who’s using it?STAT
  • 1h agoSTAT+: After Medicare punts RPM overhaul to 2029, advocates see window to fight backSTAT
  • 13h agoSTAT+: Pharma’s trade group spent heavily on search ads to sway public opinionSTAT
  • 13h agoBallot measures affirm divisions over abortion and transgender issuesSTAT