pharmadog
News
when
  • Latest
  • Archive
by source
  • All Sources
  • Sources Page
Jobs
department
  • Clinical
  • Regulatory
  • Medical Affairs
  • Commercial
  • R&D / Discovery
  • Biostatistics / Data
  • Manufacturing / CMC
  • Market Access
therapeutic area
  • Oncology
  • Immunology
  • Neuroscience
  • Cardiovascular
  • Metabolic
  • Rare Disease
  • Infectious Disease
location & type
  • Remote Only
  • US Only
  • California
  • Massachusetts
  • Internships
  • Phase 3 Roles
  • All Jobs →
Drugs
by stage
  • Marketed
  • Phase 3
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1
  • Preclinical
browse
  • Most catalysts
  • Recently active
  • All drugs →
  • Companies
  • Patent cliff
Calendar
what
  • Trial readouts
  • PDUFA dates
  • Approvals
  • Earnings
when
  • Upcoming
  • Month grid
  • Recently passed
Sign InSubscribe
pharmadog

fetch the data · sniff the signal

Discover
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Drugs
  • Calendar
  • Companies
Hubs
  • Topics
  • Patent cliff
  • Publications
  • Readouts
Tools
  • Compare
  • Search
  • Bookmarks
Trust
  • About
  • Sources
  • Contact
Legal
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Pricing

© 2026 pharmadog.xyz

made by humans and a good dog

  • home
  • jobs
  • news
  • search
STAT·3h ago·1 min read
save

Proposed ACGME rule changes could strip resident doctors of mandatory rest periods

Oct 20, 2026·read at STAT ↗RegulatoryNegative

Arifeen Rahman, a clinical instructor in rhinology at the Medical University of South Carolina, recounts working 90-hour weeks as a junior otolaryngology resident in 2023, often exceeding the ACGME-mandated 80-hour limit but relying on required rest periods to stay functional.

Current ACGME regulations mandate at least eight hours off between scheduled shifts and additional time off after extended duty periods, creating buffers that protect residents from fatigue and reduce the risk of errors.

The council now proposes to drop the eight-hour gap requirement and shorten the mandatory recovery time after long shifts, arguing for greater flexibility in scheduling.

Critics warn that eroding these safeguards could increase burnout among trainees and jeopardize patient safety, especially in high-intensity procedural specialties.

source

This writeup was produced by pharmadog from original reporting by STAT.

Original headline: “Opinion: Resident physicians may lose some of their most important work hour protections”

read at STAT ↗
1,062 words · retrieved 2h ago
sharex / twitterlinkedin

comments(0)

5-min edit window · permanent after that
sign in to leave a comment · permanent archive after 5 minutes
no comments yet — first sniff?

companies & drugs in this story

companies
Stanford University
topics
Ophthalmology

related stories

  • Oct 8The Nobel boys club (again)STAT
  • Oct 5STAT+: Nobel-winning optogenetics research has led to experimental treatments for blindness and Alzheimer’sSTAT
  • Oct 52026 Nobel Prize in Medicine awarded for brain research tool called optogeneticsSTAT
  • Oct 5Trio of scientists who developed neuron light switches win Nobel Prize in Physiology or MedicineFierce Biotech
  • Jul 22US ‘eroding’ lead in rare diseases a matter of national security: ReportBioSpace