pharmadog
News
when
  • Latest
  • Archive
by source
  • All Sources
  • Sources Page
Jobs
department
  • Clinical
  • Regulatory
  • Medical Affairs
  • Commercial
  • R&D / Discovery
  • Biostatistics / Data
  • Manufacturing / CMC
  • Market Access
therapeutic area
  • Oncology
  • Immunology
  • Neuroscience
  • Cardiovascular
  • Metabolic
  • Rare Disease
  • Infectious Disease
location & type
  • Remote Only
  • US Only
  • California
  • Massachusetts
  • Internships
  • Phase 3 Roles
  • All Jobs →
Drugs
by stage
  • Marketed
  • Phase 3
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1
  • Preclinical
browse
  • Most catalysts
  • Recently active
  • All drugs →
  • Companies
  • Patent cliff
Calendar
what
  • Trial readouts
  • PDUFA dates
  • Approvals
  • Earnings
when
  • Upcoming
  • Month grid
  • Recently passed
Sign InSubscribe
pharmadog

fetch the data · sniff the signal

Discover
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Drugs
  • Calendar
  • Companies
Hubs
  • Topics
  • Patent cliff
  • Publications
  • Readouts
Tools
  • Compare
  • Search
  • Bookmarks
Trust
  • About
  • Sources
  • Contact
Legal
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Pricing

© 2026 pharmadog.xyz

made by humans and a good dog

  • home
  • jobs
  • news
  • search
STAT·1h ago·1 min read
save

Study finds nearly 40% of FDA advisory panels include reps linked to pharma-funded advocacy groups

Oct 13, 2026·read at STAT ↗RegulatoryNegative

A new analysis published in Health Affairs Scholar examined FDA advisory committee meetings over the past 20 years and found that almost 40% featured a patient or consumer representative with active ties to an advocacy group that receives funding from pharmaceutical companies.

In some committees, more than half of the patient or consumer members had such connections. Additionally, over 10% of meetings included a representative whose organization was funded by the specific drug maker whose product was under review.

Most of these financial relationships were not disclosed during the meetings, raising concerns that undisclosed conflicts could influence voting behavior and highlight gaps in the FDA’s conflict‑of‑interest policies.

source

This writeup was produced by pharmadog from original reporting by STAT.

Original headline: “STAT+: Many patient, consumer reps on FDA advisory panels have ties to groups funded by pharma, analysis finds”

read at STAT ↗
524 words · retrieved 1h ago
sharex / twitterlinkedin

comments(0)

5-min edit window · permanent after that
sign in to leave a comment · permanent archive after 5 minutes
no comments yet — first sniff?

companies & drugs in this story

companies
LILLYUltragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
drugs
ObesityRare DiseaseUndisclosed
topics
AdCom5ObesityRare Disease

related stories

  • Oct 5Lilly doubles down on Gate alliance to unlock new drug class with another $870M+ in biobucksBioSpace
  • Aug 5STAT+: Exemption of rare disease therapies in drug-pricing pilots would wipe out huge savings, analysis findsSTAT
  • Jul 27STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re reading about a U.S. peptide panel’s votes, Amgen scuffling with the FDA, and moreSTAT
  • Jul 23FDA panel confronting peptide controversySTAT
  • May 1STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re reading about obesity drugs and a compounding list, an AstraZeneca setback, and moreSTAT