Panel discusses how questions about health equity shape public trust in science
Anil Oza reported that he participated in a National Academies of Science roundtable focused on population health and how research communication influences public trust.
The discussion highlighted that the phrasing used when describing health-equity research can affect how the public perceives science, and that some researchers feel political pressure to stay silent about their findings.
Phillip Alberti of the Association of American Medical Colleges Center for Health Justice cited a poll showing varying support for health-equity policies depending on how questions are asked, underscoring the importance of framing.
This writeup was produced by pharmadog from original reporting by STAT.
Original headline: “Who supports policies for ‘health equity’? It depends on how you’re asking”
read at STAT ↗
comments(0)
5-min edit window · permanent after that