ADA internal review refutes censorship and police involvement allegations after conference ejections
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) completed an internal review following the removal of several members from its scientific sessions in New Orleans. The review concluded that there was no censorship of the editorial content and no involvement of local police in the incident.
The incident occurred three months earlier when ADA members were escorted out while distributing an editorial that criticized recent federal funding cuts. The members claimed the organization suppressed their views and called on police to enforce the removal.
ADA’s editor‑in‑chief, Steven Kahn, and other senior staff questioned the independence of the organization’s actions, prompting the review. The findings dismissed both the censorship and police involvement allegations and also rejected the notion that the ADA acted in response to the editorial’s substance.
STAT’s coverage notes that the ADA’s response aims to restore confidence in its governance and underscores ongoing tensions over funding and policy advocacy within the diabetes research community.
This writeup was produced by pharmadog from original reporting by STAT.
Original headline: “HHS spins a tale of a would-be content creator child”
read at STAT ↗
comments(0)
5-min edit window · permanent after that