pharmadog
News
when
  • Latest
  • Archive
by source
  • All Sources
  • Sources Page
Jobs
department
  • Clinical
  • Regulatory
  • Medical Affairs
  • Commercial
  • R&D / Discovery
  • Biostatistics / Data
  • Manufacturing / CMC
  • Market Access
therapeutic area
  • Oncology
  • Immunology
  • Neuroscience
  • Cardiovascular
  • Metabolic
  • Rare Disease
  • Infectious Disease
location & type
  • Remote Only
  • US Only
  • California
  • Massachusetts
  • Internships
  • Phase 3 Roles
  • All Jobs →
Drugs
by stage
  • Marketed
  • Phase 3
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1
  • Preclinical
browse
  • Most catalysts
  • Recently active
  • All drugs →
  • Companies
  • Patent cliff
Calendar
what
  • Trial readouts
  • PDUFA dates
  • Approvals
  • Earnings
when
  • Upcoming
  • Month grid
  • Recently passed
Sign InSubscribe
pharmadog

fetch the data · sniff the signal

Discover
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Drugs
  • Calendar
  • Companies
Hubs
  • Topics
  • Patent cliff
  • Publications
  • Readouts
Tools
  • Compare
  • Search
  • Bookmarks
Trust
  • About
  • Sources
  • Contact
Legal
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Pricing

© 2026 pharmadog.xyz

made by humans and a good dog

  • home
  • jobs
  • news
  • search
STAT·May 12·1 min read
save

New sepsis AI models face adoption hurdles despite improved performance

May 12, 2026·read at STAT ↗Neutral

Hospitals once embraced an Epic sepsis‑prediction algorithm that promised early alerts for a condition that kills over 350,000 Americans each year. In practice the tool generated far more alerts than clinicians could handle, leading many to ignore or disable it.

Five years later a wave of new AI models is entering the market. Epic has released a re‑engineered version of its original algorithm, and several startups are piloting their own sepsis‑prediction tools in health systems.

Industry experts caution that raw performance metrics will not guarantee uptake. Successful deployment will require seamless integration with electronic health records, manageable alert volumes, and trust from clinicians who must act on the warnings.

For hospitals, the challenge now is to balance the promise of more accurate predictions with the practical realities of workflow and alert fatigue, shaping the next phase of AI adoption in critical care.

source

This writeup was produced by pharmadog from original reporting by STAT.

Original headline: “STAT+: In the battle of sepsis algorithms, performance alone doesn’t predict victory”

read at STAT ↗
544 words · retrieved May 12
sharex / twitterlinkedin

comments(0)

5-min edit window · permanent after that
sign in to leave a comment · permanent archive after 5 minutes
no comments yet — first sniff?

companies & drugs in this story

companies
LEADING
topics
Infectious Disease

related stories

  • Jul 15Opinion: Why we still don’t know what foods are the source of the cyclospora outbreakSTAT
  • Jul 8Bryan Johnson’s chronic disease is notoriously difficult to diagnoseSTAT
  • Jul 8Transplants extended survival for patients whose stage 4 lung cancer hadn’t spread, study saysSTAT
  • Jul 2Opinion: CDC leadership continues to try to manufacture a scientific debate on vaccines where none existsSTAT
  • Jun 2910 clinical trials to watch in the second half of 2026BioPharma Dive