pharmadog
News
when
  • Latest
  • Archive
by source
  • All Sources
  • Sources Page
Jobs
department
  • Clinical
  • Regulatory
  • Medical Affairs
  • Commercial
  • R&D / Discovery
  • Biostatistics / Data
  • Manufacturing / CMC
  • Market Access
therapeutic area
  • Oncology
  • Immunology
  • Neuroscience
  • Cardiovascular
  • Metabolic
  • Rare Disease
  • Infectious Disease
location & type
  • Remote Only
  • US Only
  • California
  • Massachusetts
  • Internships
  • Phase 3 Roles
  • All Jobs →
Drugs
by stage
  • Marketed
  • Phase 3
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1
  • Preclinical
browse
  • Most catalysts
  • Recently active
  • All drugs →
  • Companies
  • Patent cliff
Calendar
what
  • Trial readouts
  • PDUFA dates
  • Approvals
  • Earnings
when
  • Upcoming
  • Month grid
  • Recently passed
Sign InSubscribe
pharmadog

fetch the data · sniff the signal

Discover
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Drugs
  • Calendar
  • Companies
Hubs
  • Topics
  • Patent cliff
  • Publications
  • Readouts
Tools
  • Compare
  • Search
  • Bookmarks
Trust
  • About
  • Sources
  • Contact
Legal
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Pricing

© 2026 pharmadog.xyz

made by humans and a good dog

  • home
  • jobs
  • news
  • search
STAT·Aug 28·1 min read
save

Medicare’s G2211 billing code for relationship-based primary care falls short of expectations

Aug 28, 2026·read at STAT ↗RegulatoryNegative

The Medicare G2211 billing code, added in 2024, lets doctors add $16 to each visit when they provide comprehensive, relationship‑based primary care. It was meant to reward the broader set of services that primary‑care physicians deliver beyond a brief office exam.

Physician‑researcher Ishani Ganguli, who both studies and bills the code, describes a typical visit that includes injury assessment, medication adjustments, anxiety counseling, vaccine administration and follow‑up coordination. She argues that the code’s flat fee does not reflect the full scope of work involved in true relationship‑based care.

Early observations suggest the incentive may not be driving the intended changes. Uptake appears limited and the extra payment may be insufficient to offset the additional time and resources required. Ganguli concludes that the policy’s impact remains uncertain and may need redesign to achieve its goals.

source

This writeup was produced by pharmadog from original reporting by STAT.

Original headline: “Opinion: A billing code was supposed to incentivize relationship-based primary care for Medicare patients. It may not be working as hoped”

read at STAT ↗
1,226 words · retrieved Aug 28
sharex / twitterlinkedin

comments(0)

5-min edit window · permanent after that
sign in to leave a comment · permanent archive after 5 minutes
no comments yet — first sniff?

companies & drugs in this story

topics
Vaccine2HematologyHypertensionInfectious DiseasePain

related stories

  • 2d agoCaribou layoffs could wipe out 90% of staffBioSpace
  • Aug 11Stopping statins in people over 75 at low risk for heart disease didn’t increase deathsSTAT
  • Sep 21President Trump’s newest vaccine ‘demands’ repeat old misinformationSTAT
  • Sep 21Skeptical about modern medicine? I know the feeling — and want to listenSTAT
  • Jun 2910 clinical trials to watch in the second half of 2026BioPharma Dive